Jan 18, 2007, 02:21 AM // 02:21
|
#1
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Guild: HEVN
Profession: W/
|
Which Computer? (again, sorry)
Yes I know I just recently made a thread about this, But I recently found another computer which I am interested in.
I play games such as WoW, Guild Wars, CSS, and BF2.
I don't know very much about computers, I dont know which of these 2 is better.
1. http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI....6199&rd=1&rd=1
2. http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI....5054&rd=1&rd=1
3. http://cgi.ebay.com.au/USED-AMD-Athl...QQcmdZViewItem
Which of these is more powerful?
Thanks
Last edited by Nucking Foobz; Jan 18, 2007 at 02:38 AM // 02:38..
|
|
|
Jan 18, 2007, 02:44 AM // 02:44
|
#2
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Guild: Guardians Alliance [ALLY] now recruiting
Profession: D/A
|
none of these are very powerful, you should minimally have a dual core processor, pentium 4's and anthlon 64's are out dated now. looking at the prices that you have on the computer choices your best bet is going with a brand name computer like dell or gateway but if your willing to dish out another 500-1,000 bucks(1500+) then i like the widow pcs and they tend to get very good reviews. www.widowpc.com
enjoy
|
|
|
Jan 18, 2007, 03:16 AM // 03:16
|
#3
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Guild: HEVN
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by holyjew888
none of these are very powerful, you should minimally have a dual core processor, pentium 4's and anthlon 64's are out dated now. looking at the prices that you have on the computer choices your best bet is going with a brand name computer like dell or gateway but if your willing to dish out another 500-1,000 bucks(1500+) then i like the widow pcs and they tend to get very good reviews. www.widowpc.com
enjoy
|
I'm not spending any higher than $800AUD.
Oh and if i read correctly, computer 1 has a duel core processor.
|
|
|
Jan 18, 2007, 05:06 AM // 05:06
|
#4
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Crystal Lake, Illinois
Guild: Grenths Rejects [GR]
|
The first one is the best of them, by far. Don't even consider the third option on your list as the person who wrote that add has no idea what (s)he is talking about (i.e. AMD 64 3000+ IS NOT a 3GHz processor (it runs at 1.8 like in the system specs screen)) Only thing you should find out before hand is more information on the RAM in computer 1, speed and if its DDR2 or not.
|
|
|
Jan 18, 2007, 05:19 AM // 05:19
|
#5
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Guild: HEVN
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sentao Nugra
The first one is the best of them, by far. Don't even consider the third option on your list as the person who wrote that add has no idea what (s)he is talking about (i.e. AMD 64 3000+ IS NOT a 3GHz processor (it runs at 1.8 like in the system specs screen)) Only thing you should find out before hand is more information on the RAM in computer 1, speed and if its DDR2 or not.
|
Its just regular DDR, would that still make it the best?
|
|
|
Jan 18, 2007, 05:58 AM // 05:58
|
#6
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Stoke, England
Guild: The Godless [GOD]
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sentao Nugra
The first one is the best of them, by far. Don't even consider the third option on your list as the person who wrote that add has no idea what (s)he is talking about (i.e. AMD 64 3000+ IS NOT a 3GHz processor (it runs at 1.8 like in the system specs screen)) Only thing you should find out before hand is more information on the RAM in computer 1, speed and if its DDR2 or not.
|
Actually if you read it the seller states that it out performs a 3GHz Pentium4 not that the AMD is 3GHz. That I can easily believe as my Athlon64 3200+ 'Venice' easily outperforms 3.4GHz Pentium4's in benchmarks.
|
|
|
Jan 18, 2007, 06:32 AM // 06:32
|
#7
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: south mississippi
Guild: Warriors Of Melos WOM
Profession: E/N
|
Replying to some of these people, get what you can afford . I have a post here on older technology that you should read and it is worth a look. Dual core cpu's although can outperform a single core cpu are at the moment rather expensive and most of us cannot afford them. So it is best to look around and find out as much as you can about what is affordable. Then upgrade as time and money allow.
Mega Mouse
|
|
|
Jan 18, 2007, 06:58 AM // 06:58
|
#8
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Guild: HEVN
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MegaMouse
Replying to some of these people, get what you can afford . I have a post here on older technology that you should read and it is worth a look. Dual core cpu's although can outperform a single core cpu are at the moment rather expensive and most of us cannot afford them. So it is best to look around and find out as much as you can about what is affordable. Then upgrade as time and money allow.
Mega Mouse
|
The Duel-Core computer is only $40AUD more expensive then the others, so I guess I'll go with that, thanks.
|
|
|
Jan 18, 2007, 07:37 AM // 07:37
|
#9
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Illinois
Guild: Feners Reve
|
Seriously, dual core CPUs are not massively better like they seem to be made out to be. Check out some benchmarks of single and dual core CPUs that are rated at the same "speed". Their performances will often times surprise you...unless things have changes massively in the last 6 months.
Also, don't try to compare the AMD and the Intell CPU speeds as they are not in the same...uhh, hmm..."format" is maybe what I want to say... sorry it's late and words are failing me. But they don't mean the same thing, like a 2.0GHz AMD may be a lot more powerfull than a 3.0GHz intell.
|
|
|
Jan 18, 2007, 07:54 AM // 07:54
|
#10
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: los angeles, ca
Profession: W/N
|
google conroe
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:13 PM // 12:13.
|